McNeal v. Evert, et al

Filing 140

ORDER and RAND notice signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/31/12 ORDERING that the 138 Findings and Recommendations are VACATED; Defendants motion for summary judgment 83 is DENIED without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date of this order, defendants may re-file and re-serve theirmotion for summary judgment. The 139 Motion for Extension of time is DENIED as moot.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VERNON WAYNE McNEAL, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:05-cv-00441 GEB EFB P Defendants. 11 ORDER vs. EVERT, et al., / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending are the undersigned’s findings and recommendations to 18 resolve defendants’ May 30, 2008 motion for summary judgment. In those findings and 19 recommendations, the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motion be granted in part. 20 However, in light of recent Ninth Circuit case authority and to ensure that plaintiff has “fair, 21 timely and adequate notice” of what is required of him to oppose defendants’ motion for 22 summary judgment, the court must vacate those findings and recommendations, and deny the 23 motion entirely without prejudice to its re-filing, and to concurrently serving plaintiff with notice 24 of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. See Woods v. Carey, ___ 25 F.3d ___, Nos. 09-15548, 09-16113, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13779 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012) (“The 26 only satisfactory practice to ensure that prisoners receive adequate notice pursuant to Rand and 1 Wyatt is to provide such notice at the time that the relevant motions are filed.” (emphasis 2 added)); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 960 (1998) (en banc) (requiring that the notice state 3 that the court has required that it be given and that it be set forth in a separate document that is 4 served with the moving papers). 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The June 29, 2012 findings and recommendations (Dckt. No. 138) are vacated. 7 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dckt. No. 83) is denied without 8 9 prejudice. 3. Within thirty days of the date of this order, defendants may re-file and re-serve their 10 motion for summary judgment. Defendants must contemporaneously serve with the motion, but 11 in a separate document, a copy of the attached “Rand Notice,”which provides plaintiff with 12 notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. Failure to do so may 13 constitute grounds for denial of the motion. 14 4. If defendants re-serve their motion, plaintiff may thereafter file and serve an amended 15 opposition within thirty days. If plaintiff fails to file an amended opposition, the court will 16 consider his existing opposition in resolving defendants’ motion. 17 18 19 5. If plaintiff files an amended opposition, defendants may thereafter file an amended reply within fourteen days. 6. Plaintiff’s July 17, 2012 motion for an extension of time to file objections to the June 20 29, 2012 findings and recommendations is denied as moot. 21 DATED: July 31, 2012. 22 23 24 25 26 2 1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 VERNON WAYNE McNEAL, 5 6 7 Plaintiff, vs. EVERT, et al., 8 RAND NOTICE* Defendants. 9 10 No. CIV S-05-441 GEB EFB P / The court requires that you be provided with this notice regarding the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 When a defendant moves for summary judgment, the defendant is requesting that the court grant judgment in defendant’s favor without a trial. If there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your case, the defendant who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case against that defendant. A motion for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendant asserts are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle the defendant to judgment. To oppose a motion for summary judgment, you must show proof of your claims. To do this, you may refer to specific statements made in your complaint if you signed your complaint under penalty of perjury and if your complaint shows that you have personal knowledge of the matters stated. You may also submit declarations setting forth the facts that you believe prove your claims, as long as the person who signs the declaration has personal knowledge of the facts stated. You may also submit all or part of deposition transcripts, answers to interrogatories, admissions, and other authenticated documents. For each of the facts listed in the defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts, you must admit the facts that are undisputed, and deny the facts that are disputed. If you deny a fact, you must cite to the proof that you rely on to support your denial. See L.R. 260(b). If you fail to contradict the defendant’s evidence with your own evidence, the court may accept the defendant’s evidence as the truth and grant the motion. The court will consider a request to postpone consideration of the defendant’s motion if you submit a declaration showing that for a specific reason you cannot present such facts in your opposition. If you do not respond to the motion, the court may consider your failure to act as a waiver of your opposition. See L.R. 230(l). If the court grants the defendant’s motion, whether opposed or unopposed, judgment will be entered for that defendant without a trial and the case will be closed as to that defendant. 24 25 26 * This notice is provided to ensure that you, a pro se prisoner plaintiff, “have fair, timely and adequate notice of what is required” to oppose a motion for summary judgment. See Woods v. Carey, __ F.3d __, Nos. 09-15548, 09-16113, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13779, at *1 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?