McNeal v. Evert, et al
Filing
146
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/21/2013 ADOPTING 145 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 141 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Ginder, McCoy, Hooven, Chenoweth and Barton; DENYING 141 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Ervin and Chatham. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
VERNON WAYNE McNEAL,
11
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
12
13
No. 2:05-cv-0441 GEB EFB P
ORDER
vs.
EVERT, et al.,
14
15
/
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On January 18, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither
22
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
/////
1
1
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 18, 2013, are adopted in full;
and
3
2. The August 2, 2012 motion for summary judgment (Dckt. No. 141) filed by
4
defendants Ginder, McCoy, Hooven, Chenoweth, Ervin, Chatham, and Barton is granted as to
5
defendants Ginder, McCoy, Hooven, Chenoweth, and Barton and denied as to defendants Ervin
6
and Chatham.
7
Dated: February 21, 2013
8
9
10
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?