McNeal v. Evert, et al

Filing 146

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/21/2013 ADOPTING 145 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 141 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Ginder, McCoy, Hooven, Chenoweth and Barton; DENYING 141 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Ervin and Chatham. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VERNON WAYNE McNEAL, 11 Plaintiff, Defendants. 12 13 No. 2:05-cv-0441 GEB EFB P ORDER vs. EVERT, et al., 14 15 / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On January 18, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 18, 2013, are adopted in full; and 3 2. The August 2, 2012 motion for summary judgment (Dckt. No. 141) filed by 4 defendants Ginder, McCoy, Hooven, Chenoweth, Ervin, Chatham, and Barton is granted as to 5 defendants Ginder, McCoy, Hooven, Chenoweth, and Barton and denied as to defendants Ervin 6 and Chatham. 7 Dated: February 21, 2013 8 9 10 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?