Anthony v. Marshall et al

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/14/09: Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed March 30, 2009, is affirmed 36 . (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JOHN MARSHALL, et al., Respondents. / On April 11, 2009, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed March 30, 2009, denying his request to file a supplemental petition. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed March 30, 2009, is affirmed. DATED: July 14, 2009. _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARK ANTHONY, Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-0482 FCD EFB P ORDER 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?