California Department of Water Resources v. Powerex Corporation
Filing
237
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/7/11 DENYING 227 Motion to Confirm End of Stay or, in the Alternative, to Lift Stay. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER
RESOURCES,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
POWEREX CORPORATION,
12
Defendant.
________________________________
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:05-cv-0518-GEB-EFB
ORDER*
14
On September 9, 2011, Plaintiff California Department of Water
15
Resources (“CDWR”) filed a “Motion to Confirm End of Stay or, in the
16
Alternative, to Lift Stay (“motion”), arguing FERC has adjudicated three
17
pertinent filings. (Pl.’s Mot., 2:1-4.) This case was stayed in an order
18
filed
19
Commission’s (“FERC”) adjudication of FERC filings referenced in the
20
stay order.
21
motion and argues FERC is still adjudicating issues that bear directly
22
on this case. (Def.’s Opp’n (“Opp’n”), 1:12-2:2.)
September
23
4,
2009,
during
the
Federal
Energy
Regulatory
Defendant Powerex Corporation (“Powerex”) opposes the
CDWR requested rehearings on the three FERC filings that CDWR
24
argues have been adjudicated. (Mot., 5:11-12.)
25
is still actively seeking relief from FERC that bears on issues in this
26
case.
This evinces that CDWR
27
28
*
argument.
This matter is deemed suitable for decision without oral
E.D. Cal. R. 230(g).
1
1
Powerex’s
argument
that
two
other
proceedings
at
FERC
2
necessitate the stay has not been shown to be within the scope of CDWR’s
3
Motion and is an argument that is not properly decided in light of the
4
motion CDWR noticed for hearing. Therefore, the merits of this argument
5
are not reached.
6
Since CDWR has not shown that the stay should be lifted,
7
CDWR's motion is denied.
8
Dated:
October 7, 2011
9
10
11
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?