Rounds v. Woodford et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 02/05/09 ordering defendants must file their response to plaintiff's second amended complaint filed on 11/03/06 22 within 20 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al., Defendants. / ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DENNIS ROUNDS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0555 GEB GGH P Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 3, 2006, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint (Doc. 22), that defendants' requested to be screened on November 20, 2006 (Doc. 24). On December 26, 2006, this court dismissed the second amended complaint (Doc. 25). Plaintiff appealed the ruling and on November 6, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, vacated and remanded (Doc. 34). The Court of Appeals found that plaintiff's claims appeared to be colorable. Defendants' must file their response to plaintiff's second amended complaint within 20 days. \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\ 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 GGH:AB roun0555.rsp Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants must file their response to plaintiff's second amended complaint, filed on November 3, 2006 (Doc. 22), within twenty days of the date of this order. DATED: February 5, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?