Banks v. Shepherd et al

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/2/10 ORDERING the 48 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED IN FULL; and Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. Case closed. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(HC) Banks v. Shepherd et al Doc. 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. MARK SHEPHERD, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On May 7, 2010, the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations were filed and served on all parties. The findings and recommendations contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations. /// /// /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PATRICK WILLIAM BANKS, Petitioner, No. 2:05-cv-00797-MCE-CHS P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. 2. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The findings and recommendations filed May 7, 2010, are adopted in full; and Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. Dated: July 2, 2010 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?