Gilman v. Fisher, et al
Filing
470
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/5/2013 ORDERING in limine Motions Hearing RESET for 5/13/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Trial RESET for 6/25/2013 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
RICHARD M. GILMAN, et al.,
10
NO. CIV. S-05-830 LKK/GGH
Plaintiffs,
11
12
v.
O R D E R
13
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
14
Defendants.
/
15
16
The California Supreme Court has now decided In re Vicks, ___
17
Cal. 4th ___, 2013 WL 781496, ___ Cal. LEXIS ___ (March 4, 2013),
18
rejecting an ex post facto challenge to Proposition 9 under the
19
California Constitution.
20
facto challenge to Proposition 9 under the U.S. Constitution is
21
therefore lifted.1
This court’s stay on Claim 8, an ex post
22
The court will therefore postpone the following upcoming court
23
dates so that the cross-motions for summary judgment on all
24
25
26
1
It appears that Vicks also rejected the ex post facto
challenge under the U.S. Constitution. However, this court is
still required to make an independent ruling on that issue.
1
1
2
surviving claims can be decided together:
1.
The in limine motions, currently scheduled to be heard
3
on March 8, 2013, are hereby CONTINUED to the court’s regular Law
4
and Motion Calendar of May 13, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.; and
5
6
2.
The trial in this matter, currently scheduled for April
23, 2013, is hereby CONTINUED to June 25, 2013 at 10:30 a.m.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
DATED:
March 5, 2013.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?