McConnell vs Lassen County et al

Filing 322

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/21/2010 GRANTING 321 Request to appear telephonically at the hearing on Petition for Approval of Minor's Compromise. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 1250 Sutterville Road, Suite 290 Sacramento, CA 95822 (916) 456-1122 (916) 737-1126 (fax) Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021 Martha M. Stringer, CSB # 156333 Attorneys for defendants, TERRY CHAPMAN and LASSEN COUNTY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) AMY McCONNELL and AMY McCONNELL on behalf of her four minor ) ) children, A.B., A.B. J.M. and J.M. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) LASSEN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; JAMES CHAPMAN, BOB PYLE, LLOYD ) ) KEIFER, BRIAN DAHLE and JACK HANSON, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ) ) OF LASSEN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; MARGARET CROSBY, DIRECTOR OF ) ) CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, LASSEN COUNTY, TERRY CHAPMAN, ) ) LOEL GRIFFITH and DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF ) ) SOCIAL SERVICES, ) Defendants. ) ) /// /// /// /// /// CASE NO: CIV-S-05-0909 FCD DAD ORDER GRANTING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT HEARING ON PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF MINORS' COMPROMISES DATE: TIME: CRTM: TRIAL: March 12, 2010 10:00 A.M. 2 Not set McConnell v. Lassen [CIV S 05-0909 FCD-DAD] Order Granting Telephonic Appearance Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having considered the request to appear telephonically and good cause having been shown, the request is hereby granted. Counsel for defendants may appear telephonically and may use the cell phone bearing the number (916) 837-5088 to do so. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 21, 2010 _________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE McConnell v. Lassen [CIV S 05-0909 FCD-DAD] Order Granting Telephonic Appearance Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?