Windham v. CA Dept of Corrections et al

Filing 147

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/17/09 APPROVING the stipulation between the parties to shorten time as to 140 motion to withdraw as counsel; Responses due 2/12/09; Motion Hearing set for 2/19/2009 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 KING HALL CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC CARTER C. WHITE, CSB #164149 U.C. Davis School of Law One Shields Avenue, Bldg. TB-30 Davis, CA 95616-8821 (530) 752-5440 Fax (530) 752-5788 ccwhite@ucdavis.edu UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAMUEL WINDHAM, JR., Plaintiff, vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 2:05-cv-0954-GEB-GGH-P STIPULATION SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL Date: February 19, 2009 Time: 10:30 a.m. Judge: Gregory G. Hollows Courtroom: 24 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: February 9, 2009 The parties hereby stipulate, and ask the Court to enter as an order, that the Plaintiff's motion to withdraw as counsel (Doc. 140) will be heard on February 19, 2009, at 10:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Hollows. Any responses to the motion will be filed on or before February 12, 2009. It is so stipulated: /S/ Carter C. White _____________________________ Carter C. White Attorney for Plaintiff /S/ Jonathan B. Paul 25 Dated: February 9, 2009 26 27 28 _____________________________ Jonathan B. Paul Attorney for Defendant M. Zhu 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: February 17, 2009 7 8 9 10 wind0954.wthd 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Dated: February 9, 2009 /S/ Kelli M. Hammond _____________________________ Kelli M. Hammond Attorney for Defendants Pulsipher, Ruiz, Evans, Moore, Powe, Traquina, Garcia, and Andrade /s/ Gregory G. Hollows _____________________________ GREGORY G. HOLLOWS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?