Cooper v. Terhune et al

Filing 66

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 5/1/07 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 65 are ADOPTED IN FULL. This action is DISMISSED for pltf's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Cooper v. Terhune et al Doc. 66 Case 2:05-cv-01043-GEB-JFM Document 66 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. CAL TERHUNE, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On March 26, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AARON L. COOPER, Plaintiff, 2:05-cv-1043-GEB-JFM-P ORDER Case 2:05-cv-01043-GEB-JFM Document 66 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 26, 2007 are adopted in full; 2. This action is dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f) and 11-110. Dated: May 1, 2007 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?