Cejas v. Blanas

Filing 104

ORDER signed by Chief Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski on 9/17/10 ORDERING the Scheduling Order and Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum 99 , 100 are MODIFIED to allow the Warden of PVSP and the CA Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation to produce in mate Andrew A. Cejas in a telephone conference room at PVSP for a pretrial conference on 9/30/10 at 2:00 PM; no later than 9/27/10, both parties will contact Caleb Gaul, 626-229-7282, tomake arrangements for the attorneys to appear by video and for the inmate toappear by telephone for the pretrial conference. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ANDREW A. CEJAS, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * MARK IWASA, * * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** No. 2:05-cv-01121-AK ORDER ON PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Pleasant Valley State Prison (PVSP), Coalinga, California, has represented to this court that video conferencing is unavailable for the pretrial conference in this matter, scheduled for September 30, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. (docket entry 101). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that: The scheduling order and Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issued on August 27, 2010 (docket entries 99 and 100) are MODIFIED to allow the Warden of PVSP and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to produce inmate Andrew A. Cejas, CDCR No. F-34368, in a telephone page 2 conference room at PVSP, for a pretrial conference on September 30, 2010, at 2:00 p.m., until completion of court proceedings or as ordered by the court. No later than September 27, 2010, both parties will contact Caleb Gaul, 626-229-7282, to make arrangements for the attorneys to appear by video and for the inmate to appear by telephone for the pretrial conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 17, 2010 A ___________________________ ALEX KOZINSKI Chief Circuit Judge Sitting by designation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?