Nelson v. City of Davis et al

Filing 192

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/12/13. DISMISSING this entire action with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
Nelson v. City of Davis et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Doc. 192 JOHN L. BURRIS, SBN 69888 ADANTE’ D. POINTER, SBN 236229 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 John.burris@johnburrislaw.com Adante.pointer@johnburrislaw.com Attorneys for plaintiff TIMOTHY C. NELSON 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 TIMOTHY C. NELSON, Plaintiff, No. 2:05-cv-01193-MCE-CKD vs. REQUEST AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 CITY OF DAVIS; JAMES HYDE, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF DAVIS; SERGEANT JOHN WILSON, individually and in his official capacity as a Sergeant for the CITY OF DAVIS; CALVIN HANDY, SERGEANT MICHAEL MASON, OFFICER JAVIER BARRAGAN, OFFICER CALVIN CHANG, OFFICER M. GARCIA, individually and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. 23 24 25 Pursuant to the fully executed Settlement Agreement and Release, Plaintiff, TIMOTHY NELSON, hereby respectfully requests that this action be 26 27 dismissed with prejudice as provided for under FRCP 41(a)(2). 28 REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL & ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Respectfully Submitted by: 3 4 Dated: August 7, 2013 The Law Offices of John L. Burris 5 6 _________/s/___________________ 7 ADANTE D. POINTER Attorney for Plaintiff TIMOTHY NELSON 8 9 ORDER 10 11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this entire action be DISMISSED with prejudice. 12 The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 13 Dated: August 12, 2013 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL & ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?