Nelson v. City of Davis et al
Filing
192
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/12/13. DISMISSING this entire action with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
Nelson v. City of Davis et al
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Doc. 192
JOHN L. BURRIS, SBN 69888
ADANTE’ D. POINTER, SBN 236229
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
John.burris@johnburrislaw.com
Adante.pointer@johnburrislaw.com
Attorneys for plaintiff
TIMOTHY C. NELSON
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
TIMOTHY C. NELSON,
Plaintiff,
No. 2:05-cv-01193-MCE-CKD
vs.
REQUEST AND ORDER TO
DISMISS ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CITY OF DAVIS; JAMES HYDE, individually
and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for
the CITY OF DAVIS; SERGEANT JOHN
WILSON, individually and in his official
capacity as a Sergeant for the CITY OF DAVIS;
CALVIN HANDY, SERGEANT MICHAEL
MASON, OFFICER JAVIER BARRAGAN,
OFFICER CALVIN CHANG, OFFICER M.
GARCIA, individually and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,
Defendants.
23
24
25
Pursuant to the fully executed Settlement Agreement and Release,
Plaintiff, TIMOTHY NELSON, hereby respectfully requests that this action be
26
27
dismissed with prejudice as provided for under FRCP 41(a)(2).
28
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL & ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
1
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
Respectfully Submitted by:
3
4
Dated: August 7, 2013
The Law Offices of John L. Burris
5
6
_________/s/___________________
7
ADANTE D. POINTER
Attorney for Plaintiff TIMOTHY NELSON
8
9
ORDER
10
11
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this entire action be DISMISSED with prejudice.
12
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
13
Dated: August 12, 2013
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL & ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?