Brodheim v Welch, et al

Filing 77

[DISREGARD - DUPLICATE - REFER TO 75 AS ORIGINAL] ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/8/13 ORDERING that Defendant are not required to respond to Plaintiff's fifth amended complaint, filed 8/30/13. Plaintiff shall file a sixth Amended Complaint on or before 10/8/13. Defendants shall file their response to the amended complaint on or before 11/8/13. (Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified on 10/9/2013 (Marciel, M).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL BRODHEIM,

12
13
14

No. 2:05-cv-1512 LKK GGH P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

LOUIE DININNI, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

The parties have stipulated that defendants will not be required to respond to the fifth

18

amended complaint, filed August 30, 2013, due to plaintiff’s request to file a sixth amended

19

and/or supplemental complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

20
21

1. Defendants are not required to respond to plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint, filed
August 30, 2013;

22

2. Plaintiff shall file a sixth amended complaint on or before October 8, 2013.

23

3. Defendants shall file their response to the amended complaint on or before November

24

8, 2013.

25

Dated: October 8, 2013

26

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

27

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28

GGH:076/Brod1512.36