Brodheim v Welch, et al
[DISREGARD - DUPLICATE - REFER TO 75 AS ORIGINAL] ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/8/13 ORDERING that Defendant are not required to respond to Plaintiff's fifth amended complaint, filed 8/30/13. Plaintiff shall file a sixth Amended Complaint on or before 10/8/13. Defendants shall file their response to the amended complaint on or before 11/8/13. (Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified on 10/9/2013 (Marciel, M).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 2:05-cv-1512 LKK GGH P
LOUIE DININNI, et al.,
The parties have stipulated that defendants will not be required to respond to the fifth
amended complaint, filed August 30, 2013, due to plaintiff’s request to file a sixth amended
and/or supplemental complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants are not required to respond to plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint, filed
August 30, 2013;
2. Plaintiff shall file a sixth amended complaint on or before October 8, 2013.
3. Defendants shall file their response to the amended complaint on or before November
Dated: October 8, 2013
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?