Hall v. Pliler et al

Filing 96

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/15/10 ORDERING that the court finds it appropriate to vacate the current trial date. Once the motion for summary judgment has been addressed, if appropriate, the court may reset a trial date.(Dillon, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. C. PLILER, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, this case is before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On April 22, 2010, the court issued an order setting a trial date and a deadline to file any successive motions for summary judgment. The trial was set for August 31, 2010, and the last day to file a successive motion for summary judgment was May 14, 2010. On May 14, 2010, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. To date, Plaintiff has not responded to that motion, and the proper time for so doing has passed. /// /// 1 GREGORY ANDREW HALL, Plaintiff, ORDER No. CIV S-05-1556-CMK-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Accordingly, the court finds it appropriate to vacate the current trial date. Once the motion for summary judgment has been addressed, if appropriate, the court may reset a trial date. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 15, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2