Clinton v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 429

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/03/10 granting 423 Motion for in camera review of confidential memorandums. Defendants shall produce unredacted versions of the confidential memorandums to the court within 15 days of the da te of this order, for the court to conduct an in camera review. Once the court has reviewed the documents in camera, the court will issue an order providing the parties notice of the court's findings and determination as to whether an unredacted version of the confidential memorandum(s) is to be produced to plaintiff. (Plummer, M)

(PC) Clinton v. California Department of Corrections et al

Doc. 429

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is Plaintiff's objection to the production of confidential memorandums in redacted version (Doc. 423), in response to the court's October 22, 2010, order. Plaintiff is requesting the court conduct an in camera review of the confidential memorandums to determine whether the unredacted version contains any information supportive of his case which is not in fact sensitive information or information which could jeopardize the safety and security of the institution. This request is granted. Defendants shall produce unredacted versions of the confidential memorandums to the court, within 15 days of the date of this order, for the court to conduct an in camera review. Once the court has reviewed the documents in camera, the court 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS CLINTON, Plaintiff, vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

No. CIV S-05-1600-LKK-CMK-P

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

will issue an order providing the parties notice of the court's findings and determination as to whether an unredacted version of the confidential memorandum(s) is to be produced to Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 3, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2