Clinton v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 522

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/5/2012 DENYING plaintiff's 459 Motion for Reconsideration. Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison's 1/20/2011 458 Order is AFFIRMED and NO FURTHER Motions for Reconsideration of this Order will be considered. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

THOMAS CLINTON,
Plaintiff,

12
vs.

13
14

No. CIV S-05-1600-LKK-CMK-P

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,

15
Defendants.
/

16
17

Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action

18

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is a motion for reconsideration (Doc.

19

459) of the Magistrate Judge’s January 20, 2011, order.

20

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s

21

order shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire

22

file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

23

erroneous or contrary to law. The January 20, 2011, order (Doc. 458) is, therefore, affirmed.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1.

26

The motion for reconsideration (Doc. 459) is denied;

///
1

1

2.

The Magistrate Judge’s January 20, 2011, order is affirmed; and

2

3.

No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered.

3

DATED: September 5, 2012.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2