Clinton v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 667

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 05/20/22 ORDERING The parties' stipulation is approved. The new deadlines are as follows: a. The time to conduct non-expert discovery is extended to July 11, 2022; b. The partie s shall exchange initial lists of expert witnesses by August 19, 2022; c. The parties shall exchange rebuttal lists of expert witnesses by September 19, 2022; d. The time to conduct expert discovery is extended to October 25, 2022; e. Dispositive motions shall be noticed by January 12, 2023.(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS CLINTON, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 14 Case No.: 2:05-cv-1600-JAM-DMC (PC) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES PROVIDED IN RE DKT NO. 664 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME RE DKT NO. 664 1 2 3 This Court, having considered the STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES PROVIDED IN [Dkt. 664], which has been signed by all parties, and for good cause shown: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 4 1. The parties’ stipulation is approved; 5 2. The new deadlines are as follows: 6 a. The time to conduct non-expert discovery is extended to July 11, 2022; 7 b. The parties shall exchange initial lists of expert witnesses by August 19, 8 2022; 9 c. The parties shall exchange rebuttal lists of expert witnesses by September 10 19, 2022; 11 d. The time to conduct expert discovery is extended to October 25, 2022; 12 e. Dispositive motions shall be noticed by January 12, 2023. 13 14 15 16 Dated: May 20, 2022 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME RE DKT NO. 664

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?