Clinton v. California Department of Corrections et al
Filing
669
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/19/2022 APPROVING 668 Stipulation and ORDERING new deadlines as follows: Non-Expert Discovery cutoff 10/17/2022, Parties to exchange initial lists of expert witnesses by 11/18/20 22, Parties to exchange designation of rebuttal expert witnesses by 12/19/2022, Expert Discovery Cutoff 1/31/2023, and Notice Dispositive Motions due 4/20/2023. The Parties are NOTIFIED here that the non-expert and expert discovery deadlines include the deadline for hearing any discovery related motions. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
THOMAS CLINTON,
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
14
Case No.: 2:05-cv-1600-JAM-DMC (PC)
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND DEADLINES
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES
1
2
3
This Court, having considered the STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES, and for
good cause shown:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
4
1. The parties’ stipulation is approved;
5
2. The new deadlines are as follows:
6
a. non-expert discovery cutoff - October 17, 2022;
7
b. parties to exchange initial lists of expert witnesses - November 18, 2022;
8
c. parties to exchange designation of rebuttal expert witnesses - December 19,
2022;
9
10
d. expert discovery cutoff - January 31, 2023;
11
e. notice dispositive motions - April 20, 2023.
12
The Parties are notified here that the non-expert and expert discovery deadlines include the
13
deadline for hearing any discovery related motions.
14
15
16
17
Dated: July 19, 2022
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?