Lo v. Kane

Filing 49

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 5/16/11 ORDERING that the parties shall each file a brief within 21 days of this Order addressing the impact if any that Cullen v Pinholster has on this case in light of the evidentiary hearing that was held on 3/16/11.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAO LO, 11 Petitioner, Respondent. 12 13 ORDER vs. A.P. KANE, 14 15 2: 05 - cv - 1754 - MCE TJB ________________________________/ 16 Petitioner, Pao Lo, is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel with a petition for writ of 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. An evidentiary hearing was held on March 16, 18 2011. On April 4, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Cullen v. 19 Pinholster, 131 S.Ct. 1388 (2011). 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall each file a brief within 21 twenty-one (21) days of this Order addressing the impact (if any) that Cullen v. Pinholster, 131 22 S.Ct. 1388 has on this case in light of the evidentiary hearing that was held on March 16, 2011. 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 1 1 DATED: May 16, 2011 2 3 4 5 TIMOTHY J BOMMER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?