Pogue v. Tilton

Filing 169

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/23/09 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 161 are ADOPTED IN FULL; pltf's request for a temporary restraining order 158 is DENIED. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On October 27, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations on November 9, 2009. Defendants filed their reply to the objections on November 19, 2009. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 ORDER L. QIYAM POGUE, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1873 MCE GGH P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations, filed October 27, 2009 (Docket No. 161), are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff's October 19, 2009 (Docket No. 158), request for a TRO/preliminary injunctive relief to require CDCR/PVSP to provide him with a Kosher diet at this time is denied. Dated: December 23, 2009 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?