Davis v. Woodford et al

Filing 125

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/12/14 AFFIRMING 119 ORDER and TERMINATING 123 Motion for Reconsideration. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

12
13
14

No. 2:05-cv-1898-JAM-EFB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. On January 2, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff’s

19

request for appointment of counsel. ECF No. 119. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of that order.

20

ECF No. 123.

21

Local Rule 303(f) provides that magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

22

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

23

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

24

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

25

magistrate judge filed January 2, 2014, is affirmed and the Clerk of the Court shall terminate

26

docket number 123.

27

DATED: March 12, 2014

28

/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE