Johnson v. Runnels et al

Filing 133

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/29/10 ORDERING that 132 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED; 131 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED and plaintiff has 60 days from the date this order is served to file and serve a pretrial statement.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. DAVID L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case. Plaintiff also requests an extension of time to file and serve his pretrial statement. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). That request is granted. //// //// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2123 GEB EFB P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's January 25, 2010 request for appointment of counsel is denied. 2. Plaintiff's January 5, 2010 request is granted and plaintiff has 60 days from the date this order is served to file and serve a pretrial statement. So ordered. DATED: January 29, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?