Johnson v. Runnels et al
Filing
158
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/11/2011. Defendant's Request for Separate Trial regarding punitive damages is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion In Limine is GRANTED to the extent that defendant may introduce evidence of fac t of plaintiff's felony convictions for impeachment purposes ONLY. The parties shall file: a) Motions In Limine by 5/10/2011 21 days before Trial; b) Trial Briefs by 5/17/2011 - 14 days before Trial; c) Evidentiary Objections by 5/17/2011 - 14 d ays before Trial; d) Proposed Voir Dire by 5/24/2011 - 17 days before Trial; and e) Proposed Jury Instructions by opening of Trial on 5/31/2011. No filing shall exceed 20 pages. Plaintiff's 4/4/2011 151 Motion for Order directing officials at High Desert State Prison to give him access to his legal property is DENIED as unnecessary. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
No. CIV S-05-2123 KJM EFB P
DAVID L. RUNNELS, et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
On April 6, 2011, the court held a trial confirmation hearing in the above-
16
17
captioned case. Plaintiff Byron Johnson present, proceeding pro se; Phillip Arthur appeared for
18
defendant. At the hearing, the court ordered as follows:
19
1. Defendant’s request for a separate trial regarding punitive damages is denied.
20
2. Plaintiff’s motion in limine is granted to the extent that defendant may
21
introduce evidence of the fact of plaintiff’s felony convictions for impeachment purposes only.
3. The parties shall file:
22
A.
23
before trial;
24
B.
25
26
Motions in Limine by May 10, 2011 – twenty-one (21) days
Trial Briefs by May 17, 2011 – fourteen (14) days before trial;
/////
1
1
C.
2
3
before trial;
D.
4
5
8
9
Proposed voir dire by May 24, 2011 – seventeen (17) days before
trial; and
E.
6
7
Evidentiary Objections by May 17, 2011 – fourteen (14) days
Proposed jury instructions by the opening of trial, by May 31,
2011.
No filing shall exceed twenty (20) pages.
4. Plaintiff’s April 4, 2011 motion for an order directing officials at High Desert
State Prison to give him access to his legal property (ECF 151) is DENIED as unnecessary.
10
5. Trial shall be before a jury consisting of eight members.
11
6. Trial shall take two to three days.
12
7. Trial shall take place beginning on May 31, 2011 at 9 a.m.
13
The court has considered plaintiff’s renewal of his Motion to Conduct Discovery
14
Upon a Non-Party (ECF 99), dated July 8, 2008, and hereby DENIES plaintiff’s renewed
15
motion. The court notes that all motions to compel discovery involving the remaining defendant
16
in this action were to be filed no later than February 8, 2008. (ECF 62.) A court will only
17
modify a scheduling order upon a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). Plaintiff has
18
not shown good cause.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 11, 2011.
21
22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?