Burton v. Adams et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Judge Craig M. Kellison ORDERING pltf shall submit a complete application to proceed IFP w/i 30 days from date of this order. Clerk shall provide pltf with the IFP form.(Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
(PC) Burton v. Adams et al Doc. 3 Case 2:05-cv-02131-FCD-CMK Document 3 Filed 10/26/2005 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TERRY JOE BURTON, 12 13 vs. Plaintiff, ORDER No. CIV S-05-2131-FCD-CMK-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 ADAMS, et al., 15 16 17 Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, 19 with appropriate supporting affidavits and certifications, or paid the required filing fee. See 28 20 U.S.C. 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit either a 21 completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff is 22 warned that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action. See Local 23 Rule 11-110. 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:05-cv-02131-FCD-CMK Document 3 Filed 10/26/2005 Page 2 of 2 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, 3 within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma 4 pauperis, including the required affidavits and certifications, or the appropriate filing fee; and 5 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new form Application 6 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. 7 8 DATED: October 26, 2005. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?