Zackery v. Stockton Police Department et al
Filing
54
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/1/2008 re 50 Findings and Recommendations; Dfts' motion for summary judgment, filed on 4/5/2007 is GRANTED; and this action is dismissed. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R)
(PC) Zackery v. Stockton Police Department et al
Doc. 54
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. STOCKTON POLICE DEP'T., et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On January 2, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. /// /// /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DONALD LOUIS ZACKERY, Plaintiff,
No. 2:05-cv-02315-MCE-DAD P
ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 2, 2008, are adopted in full; 2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, filed on April 5, 2007, is granted;
3. This action is dismissed. Dated: February 1, 2008 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?