Garcia v. High Desert State Prison

Filing 13

(VACATED pursuant to 16 Order)ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 5/12/06 ORDERING the F&R's filed 3/22/06 are ADOPTED IN FULL. ***Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K) Modified on 5/23/2006 (Brown, T).

Download PDF
(PC) Garcia v. High Desert State Prison Doc. 13 Case 2:05-cv-02372-GEB-EFB Document 13 Filed 05/15/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, Defendant. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner prosecuting this civil rights action without counsel. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On March 22, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were duly served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. A party appearing without counsel must notify the clerk and all parties of any address change. L.R. 83-183(b). Absent such notice, service of papers on the prior address is effective. L.R. 83-182(d). ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANIEL GARCIA, Plaintiff, 2:05-cv-2372-GEB-PAN (JFM)- P ORDER Case 2:05-cv-02372-GEB-EFB Document 13 Filed 05/15/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 22, 2006, are adopted in full; 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Dated: May 12, 2006 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?