Sandoval v. California Medical Facility

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 2/1/2008 re 19 Findings and Recommendations; This action is dismissed w/out prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R)

(PC) Sandoval v. California Medical Facility

Doc. 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On November 16, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Although plaintiff filed a letter with the court on November 30, 2006, plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations and his November 30, 2006 pleading is not directed to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOUIS SANDOVAL, Plaintiff, vs. CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, ORDER No. CIV S-05-2510 RRB EFB P

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 16, 2006, are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. DATED: 2/1/2008

/s/ Ralph R. Beistline UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
/

2