Knapp v. Hickman et al

Filing 142

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 02/05/08 GRANTING 139 Amended request for extension of time; deft's reply to opposition is due on or before 02/13/08. (Manzer, C)

(PC) Knapp v. Hickman et al

Doc. 142

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 v. R. Q. HICKMAN, et al, Defendants. ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP, Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' AMENDED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PREPARE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS 2-05-CV-2520 FCD CMK P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Good cause appearing, Defendants Ali, Boyd, C.D. Brown, D. Brown, M. Brown,

18 Broyles, Campbell, Carillo, Cherry, Clevenstine, Danzinger, Doherty, Emigh, Etheredge, Fowler, 19 Gentile, Grannis, Gutierrez, Hansen, Hein, Henderson, Hensley, Hickman, Hogan, Hurdle, 20 Kaiser, Kanipe, Keeland, Kernan, King, Klinefelter, Knipp, Knowles, Kudlata, Laguna, 21 Lattimore, Leeworthy, Lincoln, McNeil, Melching, Mesa, Mynhier, Nelson, Olson, O'Connor, 22 Poe, Presley, Rendon, Reaves, Reyes, Rianda, Robinson, Sauceda, Seinwerth, Silva, Smith, 23 Stanley, Stewart, Subia, Taylor, Uribe, Vasquez, and Warren are granted a thirty-day extension of 24 time to file a reply to Plaintiff's supplemental opposition to their motion to dismiss. Defendants' 25 reply shall be due on or before February 13, 2008. 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / /
[ P r o p o se d ] Order Granting Defendants' Amended Request For Extension Of Time To Prepare Reply To Plaintiff's Supplemental Opposition To Their Motion To Dismiss

1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 5, 2008 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

[ P r o p o se d ] Order Granting Defendants' Amended Request For Extension Of Time To Prepare Reply To Plaintiff's Supplemental Opposition To Their Motion To Dismiss

2