Sherman v. Yolo County Sheriff

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/27/2010. The petitioner's 36 Certificate of Appealability should NOT ISSUE in this action. (Marciel, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has timely filed a notice of appeal of this court's March 23, 2010 denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. Before petitioner can appeal this decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The court must either issue a certificate of appealability indicating which issues satisfy the required showing or must state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). ///// ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSEPH SHERMAN, Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0016 GEB DAD P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's February 10, 2010 findings and recommendations, petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 27, 2010

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

2