Hudson v. Carey et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/23/06 ORDERING that: Pltf shall submit, w/in 30 days, either the required filing fee of $250.00 or a properly completed application to proceed IFP; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send pltf an Application to Proceed IFP by a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action.(Brown, T)

Download PDF
(PC) Hudson v. Carey et al Doc. 7 Case 2:06-cv-00100-MCE-DAD Document 7 Filed 01/23/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. TOM L. CAREY, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Although plaintiff has attached hundreds of pages of documents to a civil rights complaint form, plaintiff has not paid the required filing fee of $250.00 or submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) and 1915(a). Plaintiff will be granted thirty days to pay the filing fee in full or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, either the required filing fee of $250.00 or a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with this order; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARCUS L. HUDSON, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0100 MCE DAD P ORDER Case 2:06-cv-00100-MCE-DAD Document 7 Filed 01/23/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 DAD:13:bb 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action. DATED: January 23, 2006. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 huds0100.3a 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?