Lamon v. Director, California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 181

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 04/11/10 re 179 Objections to 178 Order on Motion for Extension; The Order of the Magistrate Judge is Affirmed. (Williams, D)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On March 25, 2010, plaintiff filed objections, construed as a request for reconsideration, to the magistrate judge's order filed March 18, 2010, requesting counsel for the defendants to facilitate the shipment of plaintiff's other legal materials from CSP-Corcoran. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. ///// ///// ///// ///// 1 vs. DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. / ORDER BARRY LAMON, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0156 GEB KJM P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge (Docket No. 178), is affirmed. Dated: April 11, 2010

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

2