Lamon v. Director, California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 199

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 06/29/10 ORDERING that, upon 195 Reconsideration, the 189 order of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED. (Benson, A.)

(PC) Lamon v. Director, California Department of Corrections et al

Doc. 199

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On June 4, 2010, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's order filed May 21, 2010, which the court construes to be a request for reconsideration, denying plaintiff's motion to compel and request for assistance. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. ///// ///// ///// ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BARRY LOUIS LAMON, Plaintiff, vs. DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. / ORDER No. CIV S-06-0156 GEB KJM P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed May 21, 2010, is affirmed.
Dated: June 29, 2010

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

2