Lolmaugh v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Judge Peter A. Nowinski on 2/10/06 ORDERING Pltf's application to proceed IFP 2 is DENIED. W/in 20 days of service of this order, pltf may file a complete application for this court's consideration. If pltf fails timely to submit a new application, the clerk is directed to close this file. (Girgis, C)

Download PDF
(PS) Lolmaugh v. County of Sacramento et al Doc. 3 Case 2:06-cv-00257-GEB-EFB Document 3 Filed 02/10/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANA T. LOLMAUGH, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; DEPUTY DOES 1-100; DOES 1-100, Defendants. -o0oOn February 6, 2006, plaintiff filed a proposed complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff's application is incomplete. Plaintiff failed ORDER CIV S-06-0257 GEB PAN PS fully to answer Question 3­while he described the sources of money he has received in the past twelve months, he did not "state the amount you receive and what you expect you will continue to receive." Additionally, plaintiff's answer to Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00257-GEB-EFB Document 3 Filed 02/10/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Question 4 is ambiguous­he states he does not have any cash or checking or savings accounts but then provides the amount $450. Accordingly, plaintiff's application is denied. Within 20 days of service of this order, plaintiff may file a complete application for this court's consideration. If plaintiff fails timely to submit a new application, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this file. So ordered. Dated: February 10, 2006. /s/ Peter A. Nowinski PETER A. NOWINSKI Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?