Wimberly v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 2/1/2008 re 15 Findings and Recommendations; All claims contained in the complaint but for those against dfts Sacramento County, Sacramento Sheriff's Department and Lou Blanas regarding a raciallydisciminatory housing policy are dismissed. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
(PC)Wimberly v. County of Sacramento et al Doc. 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On March 22, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: \\\\\ 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LARRY WIMBERLY, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0289 DFL GGH P ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /wimb0289.800 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 22, 2007, are adopted in full; and 2. All claims contained in the complaint but for those against defendants Sacramento County, Sacramento Sheriff's Department and Lou Blanas regarding a racially disciminatory housing policy are dismissed. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(b). DATED: 2/1/2008 /s/ Ralph R. Beistline UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?