Kemper vs Catholic Healthcare West

Filing 255

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/13/2017 ORDERING that Dignity Health's Unopposed 242 Motion for a Settlement Corrected Facility Order for the Northridge Hospital Medical Center Facility is GRANTED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 EDWARD L. KEMPER and CONNIE J. ARNOLD, for themselves and all others similarly situated, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 18 CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST, a California corporation dba MERCY SAN JUAN MEDICAL CENTER, dba NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER and OTHER CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST OWNED FACILITIES, 19 SETTLEMENT CORRECTED FACILITY ORDER FOR NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER v. 15 No. 2:06-cv-00295-TLN-EFB Defendants. 16 17 20 21 This matter, having come before the Court on the Unopposed Motion for a Settlement 22 Corrected Facility Order for the Northridge Hospital Medical Center Facility, filed by Defendant 23 Dignity Health, a California public benefit corporation formerly named Catholic Healthcare West 24 (“Dignity Health”), and the Court having reviewed the Motion and being otherwise fully advised 25 on the matter: 26 It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Dignity Health’s Unopposed Motion for 27 a Settlement Corrected Facility Order for the Northridge Hospital Medical Center Facility is 28 GRANTED. A Settlement Corrected Facility Order is hereby entered as to Northridge Hospital 1 1 Medical Center, including each of its related facilities as identified in Section 2 of the Facility 2 Consent Decree – Northridge Hospital Medical Center, which has fulfilled its obligations under 3 and complied with its Consent Decree and Facility Modification Plan. This Order constitutes a 4 final judgment for purposes of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54. 5 6 Dated: February 13, 2017 7 8 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?