Tucker v. BNSF Railway Company et al

Filing 87

STIPULATION and ORDER 86 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/11/09 ORDERING that dfts BNSF Railway Company, David Lynn Verley, and Verley Farms are DISMISSED. Each party agrees to bear their own costs. (Kastilahn, A)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
HILDEBRAND, MCLEOD & NELSON, INC.

Anthony S. Petru, Esq., State Bar No. 91399 David B. Draheim, Esq., State Bar No. 036339 Quynh L. Nguyen, Esq., State Bar No. 139628 HILDEBRAND, McLEOD & NELSON, LLP 350 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Fourth Floor Oakland, CA 94612-2006 TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL S. TUCKER Adrian L. Randolph, Esq., State Bar No. 133577 Thomas A. Cregger, Esq., State Bar No. 124402 Stephanie L. Quinn, Esq., State Bar No. 216655 RANDOLPH, CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP 1030 G Street Sacramento, CA 95814 TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY Mark S. Tratten, Esq., State Bar No. 119330 Vandana Kamboj, Esq., State Bar No. 239680 ERICKSEN, ARBUTHNOT, KILDUFF, DAY & LINDSTROM, INC. 100 Howe Avenue, Suite 110 South Sacramento, CA 95825 TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants DAVID LYNN VERLEY and VERLEY FARMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SACRAMENTO

11
WESTLAKE BUILDING 350 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, FOURTH FLOOR OAKLAND CALIFORNIA 94612-2006

12 13
[phone]

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MICHAEL S. TUCKER, Plaintiff, vs. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a corporation; VERLEY FARMS, business entity, form unknown; DAVID LYNN VERLEY, an individual, Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-00395 JAM EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, VERLEY FARMS AND DAVID LYNN VERLEY

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties and through their respective counsel 1

Stipulation and Order of Dismissal 2:06-cv-395 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
HILDEBRAND, MCLEOD & NELSON, INC.

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff MICHAEL S. TUCKER's action be and is hereby DISMISSED against defendant BNSF RAILROAD COMPANY, and defendants VERLEY FARMS and DAVID LYNN VERLEY. Each party agrees to bear their own costs. Dated: February , 2009 HILDEBRAND, McLEOD & NELSON, LLP

By:

/s/ Anthony S. Petru ANTHONY S. PETRU, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL S. TUCKER

Dated: February

, 2009

RANDOLPH, CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP

11
WESTLAKE BUILDING 350 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, FOURTH FLOOR OAKLAND CALIFORNIA 94612-2006

12 13
[phone]

By:

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

/s/ Thomas A. Cregger THOMAS A. CREGGER, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: February

, 2009

ERICKSON-ARBUTHNOT

By:

/s/ Mark S. Tratten MARK S. TRATTEN, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants DAVID LYNN VERLEY and VERLY FARMS

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED: DATED: February 11, 2009. /s/ John A. Mendez__________________ THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

2
Stipulation and Order of Dismissal 2:06-cv-395 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com