Richardson v. Carey

Filing 3

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:06cv00499 LKK DAD) to Fresno (1:06cv00306 OWW DLB HC) signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/17/2006. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
(HC)Richardson v. Carey Doc. 3 Case 2:06-cv-00499-LKK-DAD Document 3 Filed 03/20/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. TOM L. CAREY, Warden, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner has not paid the required filing fee or submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus challenges a judgment of conviction entered by the Kern County Superior Court in Bakersfield, California. Cases arising in Kern County must be filed in the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(d). An action that has not been commenced in the proper division of the court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Accordingly, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court for all further proceedings. ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICHARD EDWARD RICHARDSON, Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0499 LKK DAD P ORDER Case 2:06-cv-00499-LKK-DAD Document 3 Filed 03/20/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DAD:13:bb Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number to be assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 DATED: March 17, 2006. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 rich0499.109 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?