Fleeman v. Castro

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/23/09 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 17 ADOPTED IN FULL; Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED; the Clerk is directed to enter jdugment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The findings and recommendations issued on January 6, 2009, incorrectly state that petitioner is proceeding pro se. 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRANDON R. FLEEMAN, Petitioner, vs. ROY CASTRO, Warden, Respondent. / No. CIV S-06-0652-FCD-CMK-P ORDER Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel,1 brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On January 6, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 full; In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 6, 2009, are adopted in 2. 3. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is denied; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. DATED: January 23, 2009. _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?