White v Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Filing 116

ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENT signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/20/2010 ORDERING that Pltf's Statement of Facts in Opposition to Dft's Motion for Summary Judgment to Preclude Punitive Damages. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
White v Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Doc. 116 K. Greg Peterson, Esq. (State Bar Number 118287) greg@kgregpeterson.com Law Offices of K. Greg Peterson P.O. Box 254451 Sacramento, California 95865 Telephone: (916) 558-6142 Facsimile: (916) 492-2680 Bart T. Valad, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) bvalad@valadlaw.com John J. Vecchione, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) jvecchione@valadlaw.com Valad & Vecchione, PLLC 3863 Plaza Drive Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Telephone: (703) 352-4800 Facsimile: (703) 352-4820 Attorneys for Plaintiff Cheryl White, Successor in Interest to William White UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHERYL J. WHITE, SUCCESSOR TO WILLIAM WHITE, Plaintiff, v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Defendant. ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENT The Court, having heard and considered, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 141, Plaintiff Cheryl J. White's request to seal Plaintiff's Statement of Facts in Opposition to Defendant's Case No. 2:06-CV-00665-WBS-GGH Date: July 6, 2010 Complaint Filed: March 29, 2006 Trial Date: November 16, 2010 Dockets.Justia.com Motion for Summary Judgment to Preclude Punitive Damages, hereby orders that the following document be maintained under seal until further order of the Court: 1. Plaintiff's Statement of Facts in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment to Preclude Punitive Damages. Dated: This 20th day of July, 2010 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished on counsel of record in case number 2:06-CV-00665-WBS-GGH on this 6th day of July, 2010. Respectfully submitted, /s/ John J. Vecchione John J. Vecchione, Esq. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?