Cornwell v. Ylst

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/5/06 ORDERING that petitioner's request to proceed IFP is GRANTED. No order re: a stay of execution shall be issued unless and until an execution date is set by the state courts. Petitioner's appl for apptmnt of counsel is GRANTED. Pending approval by the Court of substitute counsel, the FD is appointed to represent petitioner.(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(DP) Cornwell v. Ylst Doc. 3 Case 2:06-cv-00705-RRB-GGH Document 3 Filed 04/06/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. EDDIE YLST, Acting Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent. / Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. He has filed applications pursuant to Local Rule 81-191 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; 2. No order regarding a stay of execution shall be issued unless and until an execution date is set by the state courts. 3. Petitioner's application for appointment of counsel is granted. Pending approval by the Court of substitute counsel, the Federal Defender is appointed to represent \\\\\ \\\\\ 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GLENN CORNWELL, JR., Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0705 DFL GGH P DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Case 2:06-cv-00705-RRB-GGH Document 3 Filed 04/06/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 petitioner. The court is unlikely to approve appointment of private counsel if private counsel are the sole counsel in the case. DATED: 4/5/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows __________________________________ GREGORY G. HOLLOWS U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE c o r n 0 7 0 5 .o r d 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?