Cornwell v. Ylst

Filing 49

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/17/2010 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 40 are ADOPTED in Full; Petitioner's 44 Motion for Stay of Execution is GRANTED and all court and other proceedings related to the execution of his sentence of death, including preparation for execution and the setting of an execution date, are STAYED pending final disposition of this matter. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Respondent. 15 / 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Petitioner, a state prisoner under sentence of death, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 28, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 ORDER vs. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GLENN CORNWELL, JR., Petitioner, No. 2:06-cv-00705 JAM KJN DEATH PENALTY CASE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 28, 2010 are adopted in full; 2. Petitioner's April 15, 2010 Motion for Stay of Execution is granted and all court and other proceedings related to the execution of his sentence of death, including preparation for execution and the setting of an execution date, are stayed pending final disposition of this matter. DATED: June 17, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?