Rosenblum v. Mule Creek St Prison Medical Officials, et al
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/06/09 ordering defendants are granted a 2 week extension of time to and including 02/17/09 to reply to plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PHILLIP ROSENBLUM, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 MULE CREEK STATE PRISON MEDICAL OFFICIALS, et al., Defendant. Defendants have filed a request for a two-week extension of time to reply to Plaintiff's ORDER 2:06-CV-0764 GEB DAD (P) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
18 opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, Defendants are granted a 19 two-week extension of time, to and including Tuesday, February 17, 2009, to reply to Plaintiff's 20 opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss. 21 DATED: February 6, 2009. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
/rose0764.36rep
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
