Card v. Carey et al

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/4/08 ORDERING that defendant Nunez shall notify this court, within ten days, whether he has any objection to the dismissal of the claims against him. Should defendant fail to respond, plaintiff's request will be granted. (Anderson, J)

(PC) Card v. Carey et al

Doc. 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. TOM L.CAREY, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 2, 2008, defendant Nunez filed a summary judgment motion. On January 10, 2008, plaintiff filed a response to this motion. Plaintiff states that he does not oppose the motion, but reserves the right to re-file charges against defendant Nunez. The court does not construe plaintiff's January 10, 2008, pleading as a statement of non-opposition to defendant's motion based on plaintiff's request that he be allowed to "refile" charges against defendant Nunez. If the court grants defendant's motion for summary judgment, plaintiff will most likely be precluded from refiling his claims against defendant. For these reasons, the court construes plaintiff's response as a request to voluntarily dismiss the claims against defendant Nunez. ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN CARD, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1027 GEB GGH P

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Nunez shall notify this court, within ten days, whether he has any objection to the dismissal of the claims against him. Should defendant fail to respond, plaintiff's request will be granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). DATED: 02/04/08 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 card.ord