Keeton v. Cox et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/23/2010 ORDERING that, w/in 30 days, pltf to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the 34 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TOMMY ROY KEETON, Plaintiff, vs. SERGEANT COX, et al., Defendants. / On April 19, 2010, defendant Ramirez filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). DATED: September 23, 2010. ORDER No. CIV-S-06-1094 GEB KJM P
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?