Keeton v. Cox et al

Filing 55

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/10/2011 ORDERING 52 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief is AFFIRMED. (Waggoner, D)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TOMMY ROY KEETON,

11

Plaintiff,

Defendants.

12
13

No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P

ORDER

vs.
COX, et al.,

14
15

/

16

On May 2, 2011, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a request for

17

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s April 20, 2011 order denying plaintiff’s request to

18

extend the deadline for propounding discovery requests. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a

19

magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon

20

review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling

21

was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22

/////

23

/////

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

2

magistrate judge filed April 20, 2011, is affirmed.

3

Dated: May 10, 2011

4
5
6

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2