Keeton v. Cox et al

Filing 61

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/9/11 DENYING 58 Motion for Reconsideration re 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Tommy Roy Keeton. (Matson, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TOMMY ROY KEETON,

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,

No. 2:06-cv-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P

Defendants.

ORDER

vs.
COX, et al.,

15

/

16

On June 6, 2011, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

17

judge’s order filed May 26, 2011, denying plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel. Pursuant to

18

E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or

19

contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

20

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

21

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

22

magistrate judge filed May 26, 2011, is affirmed.

23

Dated: July 9, 2011

24
25
26

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge