Wilson v. Nesbeth et al

Filing 70

ORDER denying 61 Motion for a protective order signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/04/12. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DAVID WAYNE WILSON,

11

Plaintiff,

No. CIV S-06-1139 KJM GGH P

vs.
12
13

W.C. NESBETH, et al.,

14
Defendants.
15

ORDER
/

16

On November 21, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for a protective order to obtain his

17

legal materials so he could file a pretrial statement. Doc. 61. Defendant filed a reply on

18

December 19, 2011, and indicated that plaintiff was provided access to his legal materials and

19

has filed his pretrial statement. Docs. 62, 67, 68. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion for a protective

20

order is denied as moot.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a protective

22

order (Doc. 61) is denied as moot.

23

DATED: January 4, 2012

24

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26

GGH: AB
wils1139.po2

1