Erwin v. Hugls et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/5/06 ORDERING the pltf to submit within 30 days from the date of this order, the $350.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk is directed to provide pltf with a copy of the in forma pauperis application to be used by a non-prisoner. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Erwin v. Hugls et al Doc. 3 Case 2:06-cv-01166-LKK-DAD Document 3 Filed 06/06/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. RICK HUGLS, et al., Defendants. / The pro se plaintiff is confined in Coalinga State Hospital pursuant to provisions of the California Welfare and Institutions Code. Plaintiff has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 concerning the conditions of his confinement in Solano County during civil commitment proceedings in 2003 and again in 2005. Plaintiff has not paid the $350.00 filing fee or submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) & 1915(a). Plaintiff will be granted thirty days to pay the fee or file an in forma pauperis application. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, the $350.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with this order; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOEY RAY ERWIN, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1166 LKK DAD P ORDER Case 2:06-cv-01166-LKK-DAD Document 3 Filed 06/06/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:13:bb erwi1166.3np 2. The Clerk of the Court shall provide plaintiff with a copy of the in forma pauperis application to be used by a non-prisoner. DATED: June 5, 2006. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?