Deocampo, et al. v. City of Vallejo, et al.
Filing
93
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/24/13 ORDERING for the reasons stated by the court at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' counsel's motion to withdraw be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
----oo0oo----
11
12
JASON EUGENE DEOCAMPO; JESUS
SEBASTIAN GRANT; and JAQUEZS
TYREE BERRY,
NO. CIV. 2:06-01283 WBS CMK
13
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal
corporation; ROBERT NICHELINI,
in his capacity as Chief of
Police for the CITY OF VALLEJO;
JASON POTTS, individually, and
in his capacity as a Vallejo
police officer; JEREMY PATZER,
individually, and in his
capacity as a Vallejo police
officer; ERIC JENSEN,
individually, and in his
capacity as a Vallejo police
officer; and DOES 1 through 25,
inclusive,
23
Defendants.
24
/
25
26
27
28
----oo0oo--This matter came on for hearing June 24, 2013 on the
motion of counsel for plaintiffs Jason Eugene DeOcampo, Jesus
1
1
Sebastian Grant, and Jaquezs Tyree Berry to withdraw.
(Docket
2
No. 88.)
3
Blechman appeared as counsel for defendants.
4
from both sides and addressed plaintiffs regarding the motion.
5
For the reasons stated by the court at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY
6
ORDERED that plaintiffs’ counsel’s motion to withdraw be, and the
7
same hereby is, DENIED.
8
DATED:
John Burris appeared as counsel for plaintiffs and Noah
June 24, 2013
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
The court heard
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?