Nelson v. Runnels et al
Filing
81
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/28/10 ordering plaintiff and defendants shall within 7 days after service of this order, file separate status reports identifying the estimated length of trial. The court will thereafter issue a further scheduling order setting this case for trial and setting forth the deadlines for filing pretrial statements. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
(PC) Nelson v. Runnels et al
Doc. 81
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants. / On September 16, 2010, the district judge adopted the undersigned's findings and recommendations filed August 12, 2010, and denied defendants' motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 79.) In order to set this case for jury trial and the filing of pretrial statements, the court requires the parties' estimate regarding the length of trial. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff and defendants shall, within seven (7) days after service of this order, file separate status reports identifying the estimated length of trial. //// //// //// //// 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RAYMOND PAUL NELSON, Plaintiff, Case 2:06-cv-1289 LKK KJN P
ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
nels1289.fb
2. The court will thereafter issue a Further Scheduling Order setting this case for trial and setting forth the deadlines for filing Pretrial Statements. SO ORDERED. DATED: September 28, 2010
_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
